<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W3C working draft: Use HTML(5) not Flash or Silverlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metah.ch/blog/2008/01/w3c-working-draft-use-html5-not-flash-or-silverlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metah.ch/blog/2008/01/w3c-working-draft-use-html5-not-flash-or-silverlight/</link>
	<description>Ahmet Gyger&#039;s web log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmet</title>
		<link>http://www.metah.ch/blog/2008/01/w3c-working-draft-use-html5-not-flash-or-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-3553</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metah.ch/blog/2008/01/23/w3c-working-draft-use-html5-not-flash-or-silverlight/#comment-3553</guid>
		<description>Honestly for me a soft as Flash is not comparable with the next version of HTML (aka HTML 5).

The Flash side is much more oriented rich internet application (RIA), whereas HTML5 is more oriented semantic and standards.

So if for you HTML5 is equivalent to Flash because it can make some rotation to a video component, or draw some lines, I would just answer that you may don&#039;t get the &#039;big picture&#039; of both technology.

Now about the word &#039;commonly&#039; I guess it&#039;s just a matter of competences, an expert would answer something else that a beginner would do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly for me a soft as Flash is not comparable with the next version of HTML (aka HTML 5).</p>
<p>The Flash side is much more oriented rich internet application (RIA), whereas HTML5 is more oriented semantic and standards.</p>
<p>So if for you HTML5 is equivalent to Flash because it can make some rotation to a video component, or draw some lines, I would just answer that you may don&#8217;t get the &#8216;big picture&#8217; of both technology.</p>
<p>Now about the word &#8216;commonly&#8217; I guess it&#8217;s just a matter of competences, an expert would answer something else that a beginner would do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zcorpan</title>
		<link>http://www.metah.ch/blog/2008/01/w3c-working-draft-use-html5-not-flash-or-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-3552</link>
		<dc:creator>zcorpan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metah.ch/blog/2008/01/23/w3c-working-draft-use-html5-not-flash-or-silverlight/#comment-3552</guid>
		<description>What is it that is commonly done in Flash that is not covered by HTML5 (in particular the video element and the canvas 2d API) and SVG?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it that is commonly done in Flash that is not covered by HTML5 (in particular the video element and the canvas 2d API) and SVG?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

