<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 3.0 and beyond: the next 20 years of the internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metah.ch/blog/2007/10/web-30-and-beyond-the-next-20-years-of-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metah.ch/blog/2007/10/web-30-and-beyond-the-next-20-years-of-the-internet/</link>
	<description>Ahmet Gyger&#039;s web log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaila Colbin</title>
		<link>http://www.metah.ch/blog/2007/10/web-30-and-beyond-the-next-20-years-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-3423</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaila Colbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metah.ch/blog/2007/10/30/web-30-and-beyond-the-next-20-years-of-the-internet/#comment-3423</guid>
		<description>The issue with the article is that it&#039;s merely extrapolating what we already have. Given the pace of change online, I think you&#039;re entirely correct that the Internet will be nothing short of extraordinary 20 years from now.

Last month, Gord Hotchkiss created a report on the future of search with bigwigs from Microsoft and Yahoo. I responded with a collaborative paper: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.vortexdna.com/the-complete-future-of-search-report/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Future of Search by the Rising Star Dream Team.&lt;/a&gt;

Some of our contributors merely expanded on what they already knew, just like the author of the Times article. Others allowed their imaginations full expression. Based on your comments, I suspect you&#039;ll enjoy it.

Best regards,
Kaila Colbin
VortexDNA Blogger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue with the article is that it&#8217;s merely extrapolating what we already have. Given the pace of change online, I think you&#8217;re entirely correct that the Internet will be nothing short of extraordinary 20 years from now.</p>
<p>Last month, Gord Hotchkiss created a report on the future of search with bigwigs from Microsoft and Yahoo. I responded with a collaborative paper: <a href="http://blog.vortexdna.com/the-complete-future-of-search-report/" rel="nofollow">The Future of Search by the Rising Star Dream Team.</a></p>
<p>Some of our contributors merely expanded on what they already knew, just like the author of the Times article. Others allowed their imaginations full expression. Based on your comments, I suspect you&#8217;ll enjoy it.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Kaila Colbin<br />
VortexDNA Blogger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devin</title>
		<link>http://www.metah.ch/blog/2007/10/web-30-and-beyond-the-next-20-years-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-3422</link>
		<dc:creator>devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metah.ch/blog/2007/10/30/web-30-and-beyond-the-next-20-years-of-the-internet/#comment-3422</guid>
		<description>agreed.  that&#039;s not so much provocative as it just makes sense.

this article seems accurate because the next version of the web very likely will incorporate a lot of semantic technology, but where i think it falls flat is that it doesn&#039;t consider any of the concurrent technological developments like bran computer interface (BCI), which have been around for more than 10 years already, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed.  that&#8217;s not so much provocative as it just makes sense.</p>
<p>this article seems accurate because the next version of the web very likely will incorporate a lot of semantic technology, but where i think it falls flat is that it doesn&#8217;t consider any of the concurrent technological developments like bran computer interface (BCI), which have been around for more than 10 years already, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

